American Luster



Home - Agriculture - Food - Food Research

Worst U.S. Neighborhoods To Food Hunt In Apocalyptic America

by Liam Johnson
Sunday, August 09, 2015



As part of our series on Access to Healthy Food in the United States, we are look at the toughest major neighborhoods when it comes to having access to food in apocalyptic America.

In the very unlikely event that the United States of America should be hit by an apocalypse, whether it be a nuclear attack, zombies, or a highly contagious virus as seen in the movie Contagion, we took a look at the Food Access Research data from Economic Research Service (ERS) of the United States Department of Agriculture to determine which of the major neighborhoods in the United States you would least like to be in where it comes to gathering food to hunker down for you and your loved ones.

We used the following criteria when selecting the areas featured in our list;

  • Low Access of Population to Supermarkets: Neighborhoods where its 30% of its residents had poor access to supermarkets, which basically are the most common food storage facilities we have in the country, were selected. For the urban residents in the neighborhood they had to be within a mile of the supermarkets, while rural residents were within 10 miles of a supermarket.
  • Population of 100,000 and above: While it may not be the case, a large population during a time of crises puts more pressure on the residents as it can create a belief that there are few resources to go around. This might cause them to make more drastic actions in looking for food.
  • Population Density: We looked at the number of people per household in each county, with the more densely populated areas likely to be more chaotic in food search.
  • Vulnerable Population: Finally, we also graded the neighborhoods by the percentage of vulnerable members of the society, mainly children under the age of 17 and seniors over the age of 65. These groups of people are likely to be dependent of others members of the society, and it might impact their ability when going out to forage for food.

Quick Stats

Georgia
State With Most Number of Major Neighborhoods In The List
(10)
Gwinnett, GA
Neighborhood With Largest Number of Residents In The List
(805,321)
Pinal, AZ
Neighborhood With The Largest Share of Vulnerable People
(45.79%)

Gwinnett, GA
Largest Number of Residents With Low Access
(326,505)
Gwinnett, GA
Largest Number of Urban Residents With Low Access
(326,505)
Rapides, LA
Largest Number of Rural Residents With Low Access
(20,448)

Bartow, GA
Largest Share of Kids (Age 0-17) With Low Access
(85.68%)
Bartow, GA
Largest Share of Urban Kids (Age 0-17) With Low Access
(85.68%)
Cass, ND
Largest Rate of Rural Kids (Age 0-17) With Low Access
(70.92%)

Gwinnett, GA
Largest Number of Kids (Age 0-17) With Low Access
(97,413)
Gwinnett, GA
Largest Number of Urban Kids (Age 0-17) With Low Access
(97,413)
Navajo, AZ
Largest Number of Rural Kids (Age 0-17) With Low Access
(6,242)

Bartow, GA
Largest Share of Seniors (Aged 65+) With Low Access
(80.1%)
Bartow, GA
Largest Share of Urban Seniors (Aged 65+) With Low Access
(80.1%)
Cass, ND
Largest Share of Rural Seniors (Aged 65+) With Low Access
(71.47%)

Lake, FL
Largest Number of Seniors (Aged 65+) With Low Access
(26,837)
Lake, FL
Largest Number of Urban Seniors (Aged 65+) With Low Access
(26,705)
Mohave, AZ
Largest Number of Rural Seniors (Aged 65+) With Low Access
(5,017)

Worst Neighborhoods In Apolcalyptic America To Search For Food



55

Monroe, Pennsylvania

169,842
Total Population


30.13%
Rate of Population With Low Access

54

Warren, New Jersey

108,692
Total Population


30.2%
Rate of Population With Low Access

53

Bartow, Georgia

100,157
Total Population


42.56%
Rate of Population With Low Access

52

Sussex, Delaware

197,145
Total Population


32.09%
Rate of Population With Low Access

51

Sussex, New Jersey

149,265
Total Population


34.18%
Rate of Population With Low Access

50

Rockingham, New Hampshire

295,223
Total Population


31.34%
Rate of Population With Low Access

49

Baldwin, Alabama

182,265
Total Population


33.31%
Rate of Population With Low Access

48

Lee, Alabama

140,247
Total Population


30.21%
Rate of Population With Low Access

47

Coweta, Georgia

127,317
Total Population


32.92%
Rate of Population With Low Access

46

Clermont, Ohio

197,363
Total Population


30.86%
Rate of Population With Low Access

45

Porter, Indiana

164,343
Total Population


31.46%
Rate of Population With Low Access

44

Fayette, Georgia

106,567
Total Population


30.25%
Rate of Population With Low Access

43

Hampshire, Massachusetts

158,080
Total Population


30.28%
Rate of Population With Low Access

42

Paulding, Georgia

142,324
Total Population


34.75%
Rate of Population With Low Access

41

Carroll, Georgia

110,527
Total Population


35.04%
Rate of Population With Low Access

40 Livingston, Louisiana

128,026
Total Population
61,809
Urban Population
66,217
Rural Population

30.48%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
59.12%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
1.83%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access

39 Ascension, Louisiana

107,215
Total Population
88,364
Urban Population
18,851
Rural Population

32.96%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
65.91%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access

38 Henry, Georgia

203,922
Total Population
160,239
Urban Population
43,683
Rural Population

33.11%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
66.22%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access

37 Hendricks, Indiana

145,448
Total Population
113,570
Urban Population
31,878
Rural Population

31.78%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
63.56%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access

36 Pickens, South Carolina

119,224
Total Population
83,249
Urban Population
35,975
Rural Population

33.79%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
67.19%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
.38%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access

35 St. Clair, Michigan

163,040
Total Population
93,991
Urban Population
69,049
Rural Population

31.37%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
62.66%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
.08%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access

34 Beaufort, South Carolina

162,233
Total Population
126,910
Urban Population
35,323
Rural Population

30.03%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
53.38%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
6.68%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access

33 Faulkner, Arkansas

113,237
Total Population
70,157
Urban Population
43,080
Rural Population

32.2%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
63%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
1.41%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access

32 Brunswick, North Carolina

107,431
Total Population
46,909
Urban Population
60,522
Rural Population

33.81%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
66.04%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
1.58%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access

31 Lake, Florida

297,052
Total Population
178,736
Urban Population
118,316
Rural Population

30.92%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
61.05%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
.79%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access

30 Canadian, Oklahoma

115,541
Total Population
88,154
Urban Population
27,387
Rural Population

31%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
45.24%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
16.76%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access

29 Ouachita, Louisiana

153,720
Total Population
111,550
Urban Population
42,170
Rural Population

35.65%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
54.89%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
16.4%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access

28 Ellis, Texas

149,610
Total Population
87,788
Urban Population
61,822
Rural Population

32.19%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
64.31%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
.08%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access

27 Anderson, South Carolina

187,126
Total Population
110,780
Urban Population
76,346
Rural Population

30.03%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
54.11%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
5.94%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access

26 Harrison, Mississippi

187,105
Total Population
134,250
Urban Population
52,855
Rural Population

32.96%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
57.95%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
7.97%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access

25 Forsyth, Georgia

175,511
Total Population
157,059
Urban Population
18,452
Rural Population

32.94%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
65.87%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access

24 Yavapai, Arizona

211,033
Total Population
110,762
Urban Population
100,271
Rural Population

36.17%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
52.4%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
19.93%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access

23 Coconino, Arizona

134,421
Total Population
85,880
Urban Population
48,541
Rural Population

33.81%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
28.18%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
39.45%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access

22 Tangipahoa, Louisiana

121,097
Total Population
69,497
Urban Population
51,600
Rural Population

34.3%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
65.64%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
2.95%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access

21 Citrus, Florida

141,236
Total Population
87,249
Urban Population
53,987
Rural Population

35.14%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
69.9%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
.39%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access

20 DeSoto, Mississippi

161,252
Total Population
130,144
Urban Population
31,108
Rural Population

34.43%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
60.12%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
8.74%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
Population
Urbanization
Housing Units

19 Montgomery, Tennessee

172,331
Total Population
141,824
Urban Population
30,507
Rural Population

30.61%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
57.82%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
3.39%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
Population
Urbanization
Housing Units

18 Kendall, Illinois

114,736
Total Population
55,198
Urban Population
59,538
Rural Population

31.98%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
63.82%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
.14%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
Population
Urbanization
Housing Units

17 Hawaii, Hawaii

185,079
Total Population
73,512
Urban Population
111,567
Rural Population

37.6%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
64.16%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
11.04%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
Population
Urbanization
Housing Units

16 Muscogee, Georgia

189,885
Total Population
189,885
Urban Population
-
Rural Population

33.84%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
33.84%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
Population
Urbanization
Housing Units

15 Rapides, Louisiana

131,613
Total Population
66,756
Urban Population
64,857
Rural Population

34.25%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
38.86%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
29.64%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
Population
Urbanization
Housing Units

14 Parker, Texas

116,927
Total Population
38,061
Urban Population
78,866
Rural Population

34.52%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
65.12%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
3.93%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
Population
Urbanization
Housing Units

13 Cobb, Georgia

688,078
Total Population
688,078
Urban Population
-
Rural Population

40.33%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
40.33%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
Population
Urbanization
Housing Units

12 Rockland, New York

311,687
Total Population
311,687
Urban Population
-
Rural Population

35.2%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
35.2%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
Population
Urbanization
Housing Units

11 San Juan, New Mexico

130,044
Total Population
77,998
Urban Population
52,046
Rural Population

34.33%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
43.78%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
24.88%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
Population
Urbanization
Housing Units

10 Cochise, Arizona

131,346
Total Population
79,843
Urban Population
51,503
Rural Population

40.44%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
48.23%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
32.66%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
Population
Urbanization
Housing Units

26,584

Estimated Total Number of Kids (2010)

18,618

Estimated Total Number of Kids In Urban Residences (2010)

7,965

Estimated Total Number of Kids In Rural Residences (2010)


45%
Rate of Kids With Low Access
49.19%
Rate of Urban Kids With Low Access
35.2%
Rate of Rural Kids With Low Access


11,962
Kids With Poor Acccess
9,158
Urban Kids With Poor Acccess
2,803
Rural Kids With Poor Acccess


25,019

Estimated Total Number of Seniors (2010)

14,677

Estimated Total Number of Seniors In Urban Residences (2010)

10,341

Estimated Total Number of Seniors In Rural Residences (2010)


43.74%
Rate of Seniors With Low Access
50.29%
Rate of Urban Seniors With Low Access
34.44%
Rate of Rural Seniors With Low Access


10,942
Seniors With Poor Acccess
7,381
Urban Seniors With Poor Acccess
3,562
Rural Seniors With Poor Acccess


9 Guadalupe, Texas

131,533
Total Population
88,963
Urban Population
42,570
Rural Population

36.38%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
70.25%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
2.5%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
Population
Urbanization
Housing Units

38,276

Estimated Total Number of Kids (2010)

27,615

Estimated Total Number of Kids In Urban Residences (2010)

10,661

Estimated Total Number of Kids In Rural Residences (2010)


51.61%
Rate of Kids With Low Access
70.62%
Rate of Urban Kids With Low Access
2.37%
Rate of Rural Kids With Low Access


19,755
Kids With Poor Acccess
19,503
Urban Kids With Poor Acccess
252
Rural Kids With Poor Acccess


14,482

Estimated Total Number of Seniors (2010)

7,843

Estimated Total Number of Seniors In Urban Residences (2010)

6,638

Estimated Total Number of Seniors In Rural Residences (2010)


38.11%
Rate of Seniors With Low Access
68.03%
Rate of Urban Seniors With Low Access
2.77%
Rate of Rural Seniors With Low Access


5,520
Seniors With Poor Acccess
5,336
Urban Seniors With Poor Acccess
184
Rural Seniors With Poor Acccess


8 Pueblo, Colorado

159,063
Total Population
137,225
Urban Population
21,838
Rural Population

41.14%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
52.57%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
29.71%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
Population
Urbanization
Housing Units

39,267

Estimated Total Number of Kids (2010)

32,802

Estimated Total Number of Kids In Urban Residences (2010)

6,465

Estimated Total Number of Kids In Rural Residences (2010)


48.67%
Rate of Kids With Low Access
52.9%
Rate of Urban Kids With Low Access
27.21%
Rate of Rural Kids With Low Access


19,112
Kids With Poor Acccess
17,353
Urban Kids With Poor Acccess
1,759
Rural Kids With Poor Acccess


25,364

Estimated Total Number of Seniors (2010)

20,669

Estimated Total Number of Seniors In Urban Residences (2010)

4,695

Estimated Total Number of Seniors In Rural Residences (2010)


47.01%
Rate of Seniors With Low Access
50.06%
Rate of Urban Seniors With Low Access
33.58%
Rate of Rural Seniors With Low Access


11,923
Seniors With Poor Acccess
10,346
Urban Seniors With Poor Acccess
1,577
Rural Seniors With Poor Acccess


7 Williamson, Texas

422,679
Total Population
362,407
Urban Population
60,272
Rural Population

39.37%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
57.2%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
21.53%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
Population
Urbanization
Housing Units

122,831

Estimated Total Number of Kids (2010)

107,959

Estimated Total Number of Kids In Urban Residences (2010)

14,872

Estimated Total Number of Kids In Rural Residences (2010)


53.44%
Rate of Kids With Low Access
57.85%
Rate of Urban Kids With Low Access
21.42%
Rate of Rural Kids With Low Access


65,644
Kids With Poor Acccess
62,459
Urban Kids With Poor Acccess
3,185
Rural Kids With Poor Acccess


40,883

Estimated Total Number of Seniors (2010)

34,974

Estimated Total Number of Seniors In Urban Residences (2010)

5,909

Estimated Total Number of Seniors In Rural Residences (2010)


50.77%
Rate of Seniors With Low Access
56.02%
Rate of Urban Seniors With Low Access
19.7%
Rate of Rural Seniors With Low Access


20,755
Seniors With Poor Acccess
19,592
Urban Seniors With Poor Acccess
1,164
Rural Seniors With Poor Acccess


6 Cass, North Dakota

149,778
Total Population
135,850
Urban Population
13,928
Rural Population

42.12%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
13.63%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
70.61%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
Population
Urbanization
Housing Units

50,678

Estimated Total Number of Kids (2010)

47,111

Estimated Total Number of Kids In Urban Residences (2010)

3,567

Estimated Total Number of Kids In Rural Residences (2010)


20.63%
Rate of Kids With Low Access
16.82%
Rate of Urban Kids With Low Access
70.92%
Rate of Rural Kids With Low Access


10,455
Kids With Poor Acccess
7,925
Urban Kids With Poor Acccess
2,530
Rural Kids With Poor Acccess


14,243

Estimated Total Number of Seniors (2010)

12,543

Estimated Total Number of Seniors In Urban Residences (2010)

1,701

Estimated Total Number of Seniors In Rural Residences (2010)


21.34%
Rate of Seniors With Low Access
14.54%
Rate of Urban Seniors With Low Access
71.47%
Rate of Rural Seniors With Low Access


3,040
Seniors With Poor Acccess
1,824
Urban Seniors With Poor Acccess
1,216
Rural Seniors With Poor Acccess


5 Pinal, Arizona

375,770
Total Population
265,771
Urban Population
109,999
Rural Population

31.76%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
59.06%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
4.47%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
Population
Urbanization
Housing Units

108,289

Estimated Total Number of Kids (2010)

79,996

Estimated Total Number of Kids In Urban Residences (2010)

28,293

Estimated Total Number of Kids In Rural Residences (2010)


45.55%
Rate of Kids With Low Access
60.13%
Rate of Urban Kids With Low Access
4.33%
Rate of Rural Kids With Low Access


49,324
Kids With Poor Acccess
48,098
Urban Kids With Poor Acccess
1,226
Rural Kids With Poor Acccess


63,778

Estimated Total Number of Seniors (2010)

42,258

Estimated Total Number of Seniors In Urban Residences (2010)

21,520

Estimated Total Number of Seniors In Rural Residences (2010)


39.45%
Rate of Seniors With Low Access
57.17%
Rate of Urban Seniors With Low Access
4.66%
Rate of Rural Seniors With Low Access


25,163
Seniors With Poor Acccess
24,161
Urban Seniors With Poor Acccess
1,002
Rural Seniors With Poor Acccess


4 Mohave, Arizona

200,186
Total Population
135,128
Urban Population
65,058
Rural Population

41.58%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
54.24%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
28.92%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
Population
Urbanization
Housing Units

37,716

Estimated Total Number of Kids (2010)

28,340

Estimated Total Number of Kids In Urban Residences (2010)

9,376

Estimated Total Number of Kids In Rural Residences (2010)


46.32%
Rate of Kids With Low Access
53.28%
Rate of Urban Kids With Low Access
25.27%
Rate of Rural Kids With Low Access


17,470
Kids With Poor Acccess
15,101
Urban Kids With Poor Acccess
2,369
Rural Kids With Poor Acccess


48,682

Estimated Total Number of Seniors (2010)

32,160

Estimated Total Number of Seniors In Urban Residences (2010)

16,522

Estimated Total Number of Seniors In Rural Residences (2010)


47.07%
Rate of Seniors With Low Access
55.65%
Rate of Urban Seniors With Low Access
30.37%
Rate of Rural Seniors With Low Access


22,915
Seniors With Poor Acccess
17,898
Urban Seniors With Poor Acccess
5,018
Rural Seniors With Poor Acccess


3 Gwinnett, Georgia

805,321
Total Population
805,321
Urban Population
-
Rural Population

34.49%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
34.49%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
Population
Urbanization
Housing Units

278,836

Estimated Total Number of Kids (2010)

278,836

Estimated Total Number of Kids In Urban Residences (2010)

-

Estimated Total Number of Kids In Rural Residences (2010)


34.94%
Rate of Kids With Low Access
34.94%
Rate of Urban Kids With Low Access
%
Rate of Rural Kids With Low Access


97,413
Kids With Poor Acccess
97,413
Urban Kids With Poor Acccess
-
Rural Kids With Poor Acccess


67,421

Estimated Total Number of Seniors (2010)

67,421

Estimated Total Number of Seniors In Urban Residences (2010)

-

Estimated Total Number of Seniors In Rural Residences (2010)


33.64%
Rate of Seniors With Low Access
33.64%
Rate of Urban Seniors With Low Access
%
Rate of Rural Seniors With Low Access


22,683
Seniors With Poor Acccess
22,683
Urban Seniors With Poor Acccess
-
Rural Seniors With Poor Acccess


2 Navajo, Arizona

107,449
Total Population
32,914
Urban Population
74,535
Rural Population

42.03%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
53.45%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
30.62%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
Population
Urbanization
Housing Units

29,867

Estimated Total Number of Kids (2010)

9,457

Estimated Total Number of Kids In Urban Residences (2010)

20,410

Estimated Total Number of Kids In Rural Residences (2010)


37.66%
Rate of Kids With Low Access
52.92%
Rate of Urban Kids With Low Access
30.58%
Rate of Rural Kids With Low Access


11,247
Kids With Poor Acccess
5,005
Urban Kids With Poor Acccess
6,242
Rural Kids With Poor Acccess


10,825

Estimated Total Number of Seniors (2010)

3,663

Estimated Total Number of Seniors In Urban Residences (2010)

7,161

Estimated Total Number of Seniors In Rural Residences (2010)


39.44%
Rate of Seniors With Low Access
53.6%
Rate of Urban Seniors With Low Access
32.19%
Rate of Rural Seniors With Low Access


4,269
Seniors With Poor Acccess
1,963
Urban Seniors With Poor Acccess
2,305
Rural Seniors With Poor Acccess


1 Sandoval, New Mexico

131,561
Total Population
99,967
Urban Population
31,594
Rural Population

50.34%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
53.85%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
46.84%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
Population
Urbanization
Housing Units

36,606

Estimated Total Number of Kids (2010)

29,663

Estimated Total Number of Kids In Urban Residences (2010)

6,944

Estimated Total Number of Kids In Rural Residences (2010)


53.84%
Rate of Kids With Low Access
55.46%
Rate of Urban Kids With Low Access
46.89%
Rate of Rural Kids With Low Access


19,707
Kids With Poor Acccess
16,452
Urban Kids With Poor Acccess
3,255
Rural Kids With Poor Acccess


13,588

Estimated Total Number of Seniors (2010)

10,455

Estimated Total Number of Seniors In Urban Residences (2010)

3,133

Estimated Total Number of Seniors In Rural Residences (2010)


50.86%
Rate of Seniors With Low Access
52.07%
Rate of Urban Seniors With Low Access
46.83%
Rate of Rural Seniors With Low Access


6,911
Seniors With Poor Acccess
5,444
Urban Seniors With Poor Acccess
1,467
Rural Seniors With Poor Acccess




Source: Economic Research Service (ERS) of the United States Department of Agriculture

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET