American Luster



Home - Agriculture - Food - Food Research

Toughest Neighborhoods in the Southwest Region of the U.S. For Gaining Access To Healthy Food

by Liam Johnson
Friday, August 7, 2015



As part of our series on Access to Healthy Food in the United States, we are look at the 20 toughest neighborhoods in the Southwest region of the United States for gaining access to healthy food.


Southwest Region Of U.S.



37,348,108
Total Population
29,394,551
Urban Population
7,953,557
Rural Population


Population
Urbanization
Housing Units


27.17%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
31.74%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
22.59%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access


11,081,409
Population With Poor Acccess
9,977,879
Urban Population With Poor Acccess
1,103,530
Rural Population With Poor Acccess




1.88%
Population With No Vehicular Acccess
2.12%
Urban Population With No Vehicular Acccess
1.63%
Rural Population With No Vehicular Acccess


Kids (Age 0-17)



9,964,026

Estimated Total Number of Kids In Region (2010)

8,789,921

Estimated Total Number of Kids In Urban Residences In Region (2010)

1,174,105

Estimated Total Number of Kids In Rural Residences In Region (2010)


30.65%
Rate of Kids With Low Access
31.79%
Rate of Urban Kids With Low Access
22.14%
Rate of Rural Kids With Low Access


3,054,052
Population With Poor Acccess
2,794,074
Urban Population With Poor Acccess
259,978
Rural Population With Poor Acccess


Seniors (Age 65+)



4,068,267

Estimated Total Number of Seniors In America (2010)

3,271,780

Estimated Total Number of Seniors In Urban Residences In America (2010)

796,487

Estimated Total Number of Seniors In Rural Residences In America (2010)


30.09%
Rate of Seniors With Low Access
31.68%
Rate of Urban Seniors With Low Access
23.57%
Rate of Rural Seniors With Low Access


1,224,092
Population With Poor Acccess
1,036,377
Urban Population With Poor Acccess
187,715
Rural Population With Poor Acccess


Worst 20 Neighborhoods For Healthy Food Access



20 Ellis, Oklahoma

4,151
Total Population
0
Urban Population
4,151
Rural Population

99.6%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
99.6%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
Population
Urbanization
Housing Units

19 Armstrong, Texas

1,901
Total Population
0
Urban Population
1,901
Rural Population

99.75%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
99.75%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
Population
Urbanization
Housing Units

18 Hudspeth, Texas

3,476
Total Population
0
Urban Population
3,476
Rural Population

99.92%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
99.92%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
Population
Urbanization
Housing Units

17 Irion, Texas

1,599
Total Population
0
Urban Population
1,599
Rural Population

99.97%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
99.97%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
Population
Urbanization
Housing Units

16 Coke, Texas

3,320
Total Population
0
Urban Population
3,320
Rural Population

99.98%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
99.98%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
Population
Urbanization
Housing Units

15 Lipscomb, Texas

3,302
Total Population
0
Urban Population
3,302
Rural Population

100%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
100%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
Population
Urbanization
Housing Units

14 Loving, Texas

82
Total Population
0
Urban Population
82
Rural Population

100%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
100%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
Population
Urbanization
Housing Units

13 King, Texas

286
Total Population
0
Urban Population
286
Rural Population

100%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
100%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
Population
Urbanization
Housing Units

12 Real, Texas

3,309
Total Population
0
Urban Population
3,309
Rural Population

100%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
100%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
Population
Urbanization
Housing Units

11 Terrell, Texas

984
Total Population
0
Urban Population
984
Rural Population

100%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
100%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
Population
Urbanization
Housing Units

10 Harding, New Mexico

695
Total Population
0
Urban Population
695
Rural Population

100%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
100%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
Population
Urbanization
Housing Units

9 Dewey, Oklahoma

4,810
Total Population
0
Urban Population
4,810
Rural Population

100%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
100%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
Population
Urbanization
Housing Units

8 Borden, Texas

641
Total Population
0
Urban Population
641
Rural Population

100%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
100%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
Population
Urbanization
Housing Units

7 Briscoe, Texas

1,637
Total Population
0
Urban Population
1,637
Rural Population

100%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
100%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
Population
Urbanization
Housing Units

6 De Baca, New Mexico

2,022
Total Population
0
Urban Population
2,022
Rural Population

100%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
100%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
Population
Urbanization
Housing Units

5 Throckmorton, Texas

1,641
Total Population
0
Urban Population
1,641
Rural Population

100%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
100%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
Population
Urbanization
Housing Units

4 Oldham, Texas

2,052
Total Population
0
Urban Population
2,052
Rural Population

100%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
100%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
Population
Urbanization
Housing Units

3 Sterling, Texas

1,143
Total Population
0
Urban Population
1,143
Rural Population

100%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
100%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
Population
Urbanization
Housing Units

2 Foard, Texas

1,336
Total Population
0
Urban Population
1,336
Rural Population

100%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
100%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
Population
Urbanization
Housing Units

1 Catron, New Mexico

3,725
Total Population
0
Urban Population
3,725
Rural Population

100%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
100%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
Population
Urbanization
Housing Units


Source: Economic Research Service (ERS) of the United States Department of Agriculture

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET

Source: O*NET