As part of our series on Access to Healthy Food in the United States, we are look at the 20 toughest neighborhoods in the Southeast region of the United States for gaining access to healthy food.
Southeast Region Of U.S.
78,385,623
Total Population
53,119,561
Urban Population
25,266,062
Rural Population
21.21%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
35.28%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
7.13%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
20,352,390
Population With Poor Acccess
19,039,292
Urban Population With Poor Acccess
1,313,098
Rural Population With Poor Acccess
1.83%
Population With No Vehicular Acccess
3.19%
Urban Population With No Vehicular Acccess
.48%
Rural Population With No Vehicular Acccess
Kids (Age 0-17)
17,451,027
Estimated Total Number of Kids In Region (2010)
13,270,606
Estimated Total Number of Kids In Urban Residences In Region (2010)
4,180,422
Estimated Total Number of Kids In Rural Residences In Region (2010)
28.49%
Rate of Kids With Low Access
35.26%
Rate of Urban Kids With Low Access
7%
Rate of Rural Kids With Low Access
4,972,330
Population With Poor Acccess
4,679,720
Urban Population With Poor Acccess
292,611
Rural Population With Poor Acccess
Seniors (Age 65+)
10,156,220
Estimated Total Number of Seniors In America (2010)
7,313,646
Estimated Total Number of Seniors In Urban Residences In America (2010)
2,842,573
Estimated Total Number of Seniors In Rural Residences In America (2010)
26.96%
Rate of Seniors With Low Access
34.61%
Rate of Urban Seniors With Low Access
7.26%
Rate of Rural Seniors With Low Access
2,737,628
Population With Poor Acccess
2,531,200
Urban Population With Poor Acccess
206,428
Rural Population With Poor Acccess
Worst 20 Neighborhoods For Healthy Food Access
20 Plaquemines, Louisiana
23,042
Total Population
18,541
Urban Population
4,501
Rural Population
56.86%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
82.89%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
30.84%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
19 West Feliciana, Louisiana
15,625
Total Population
0
Urban Population
15,625
Rural Population
58.03%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
58.03%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
18 Tensas, Louisiana
5,252
Total Population
0
Urban Population
5,252
Rural Population
58.52%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
58.52%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
17 Bullock, Alabama
10,914
Total Population
7,102
Urban Population
3,812
Rural Population
59.25%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
49.99%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
68.51%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
16 Franklin City, Virginia
8,582
Total Population
8,582
Urban Population
0
Rural Population
61.92%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
61.92%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
15 Pocahontas, West Virginia
8,719
Total Population
0
Urban Population
8,719
Rural Population
62.97%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
62.97%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
14 Poquoson, Virginia
12,150
Total Population
12,150
Urban Population
0
Rural Population
63.09%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
63.09%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
13 Beauregard, Louisiana
35,654
Total Population
17,481
Urban Population
18,173
Rural Population
63.78%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
54.82%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
72.73%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
12 Calhoun, Arkansas
5,368
Total Population
0
Urban Population
5,368
Rural Population
65.79%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
65.79%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
11 Gilmer, West Virginia
8,693
Total Population
8,693
Urban Population
0
Rural Population
68.71%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
68.71%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
10 Taliaferro, Georgia
1,717
Total Population
0
Urban Population
1,717
Rural Population
68.94%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
68.94%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
9 Glascock, Georgia
3,082
Total Population
0
Urban Population
3,082
Rural Population
70.26%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
70.26%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
8 Montgomery, Mississippi
10,925
Total Population
5,475
Urban Population
5,450
Rural Population
73.54%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
85.62%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
61.47%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
7 Rappahannock, Virginia
7,373
Total Population
0
Urban Population
7,373
Rural Population
74.33%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
74.33%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
6 Robertson, Kentucky
2,282
Total Population
0
Urban Population
2,282
Rural Population
74.73%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
74.73%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
5 Chattahoochee, Georgia
11,267
Total Population
8,102
Urban Population
3,165
Rural Population
75.94%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
75.99%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
75.9%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
4 Baker, Georgia
3,451
Total Population
0
Urban Population
3,451
Rural Population
80.89%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
80.89%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
3 Marion, Georgia
8,742
Total Population
0
Urban Population
8,742
Rural Population
92.41%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
92.41%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
2 Buena Vista, Virginia
6,650
Total Population
6,650
Urban Population
0
Rural Population
100%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
100%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
1 Highland, Virginia
2,321
Total Population
0
Urban Population
2,321
Rural Population
100%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
100%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
Source: Economic Research Service (ERS) of the United States Department of Agriculture Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET