As part of our series on Access to Healthy Food in the United States, we are look at the 20 toughest neighborhoods in the Rocky Mountains region of the United States for gaining access to healthy food.
Rocky Mountains Region Of U.S.
10,913,704
Total Population
8,205,632
Urban Population
2,708,072
Rural Population
26.4%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
28.54%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
24.27%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
2,871,195
Population With Poor Acccess
2,404,721
Urban Population With Poor Acccess
466,474
Rural Population With Poor Acccess
.97%
Population With No Vehicular Acccess
1.29%
Urban Population With No Vehicular Acccess
.66%
Rural Population With No Vehicular Acccess
Kids (Age 0-17)
2,917,090
Estimated Total Number of Kids In Region (2010)
2,446,923
Estimated Total Number of Kids In Urban Residences In Region (2010)
470,167
Estimated Total Number of Kids In Rural Residences In Region (2010)
28.1%
Rate of Kids With Low Access
28.93%
Rate of Urban Kids With Low Access
23.75%
Rate of Rural Kids With Low Access
819,679
Population With Poor Acccess
708,015
Urban Population With Poor Acccess
111,664
Rural Population With Poor Acccess
Seniors (Age 65+)
1,133,473
Estimated Total Number of Seniors In America (2010)
841,594
Estimated Total Number of Seniors In Urban Residences In America (2010)
291,879
Estimated Total Number of Seniors In Rural Residences In America (2010)
27.08%
Rate of Seniors With Low Access
27.68%
Rate of Urban Seniors With Low Access
25.36%
Rate of Rural Seniors With Low Access
306,989
Population With Poor Acccess
232,975
Urban Population With Poor Acccess
74,014
Rural Population With Poor Acccess
Worst 20 Neighborhoods For Healthy Food Access
20 Lake, Colorado
7,310
Total Population
7,310
Urban Population
0
Rural Population
97.24%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
97.24%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
19 Lincoln, Idaho
5,208
Total Population
0
Urban Population
5,208
Rural Population
97.43%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
97.43%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
18 Saguache, Colorado
6,108
Total Population
0
Urban Population
6,108
Rural Population
97.58%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
97.58%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
17 San Juan, Colorado
699
Total Population
0
Urban Population
699
Rural Population
99.24%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
99.24%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
16 Costilla, Colorado
3,524
Total Population
0
Urban Population
3,524
Rural Population
99.94%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
99.94%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
15 Hinsdale, Colorado
843
Total Population
0
Urban Population
843
Rural Population
100%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
100%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
14 Daggett, Utah
1,059
Total Population
0
Urban Population
1,059
Rural Population
100%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
100%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
13 Camas, Idaho
1,117
Total Population
0
Urban Population
1,117
Rural Population
100%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
100%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
12 Rich, Utah
2,264
Total Population
0
Urban Population
2,264
Rural Population
100%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
100%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
11 Wheatland, Montana
2,168
Total Population
0
Urban Population
2,168
Rural Population
100%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
100%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
10 Meagher, Montana
1,891
Total Population
0
Urban Population
1,891
Rural Population
100%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
100%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
9 Carter, Montana
1,160
Total Population
0
Urban Population
1,160
Rural Population
100%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
100%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
8 Daniels, Montana
1,751
Total Population
0
Urban Population
1,751
Rural Population
100%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
100%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
7 Treasure, Montana
718
Total Population
0
Urban Population
718
Rural Population
100%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
100%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
6 Piute, Utah
1,556
Total Population
0
Urban Population
1,556
Rural Population
100%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
100%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
5 Prairie, Montana
1,179
Total Population
0
Urban Population
1,179
Rural Population
100%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
100%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
4 Kiowa, Colorado
1,398
Total Population
0
Urban Population
1,398
Rural Population
100%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
100%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
3 Golden Valley, Montana
884
Total Population
0
Urban Population
884
Rural Population
100%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
100%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
2 Petroleum, Montana
494
Total Population
0
Urban Population
494
Rural Population
100%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
100%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
1 Clark, Idaho
982
Total Population
0
Urban Population
982
Rural Population
100%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
100%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
Source: Economic Research Service (ERS) of the United States Department of Agriculture Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET