As part of our series on Access to Healthy Food in the United States, we are look at the 20 toughest neighborhoods in the Plains region of the United States for gaining access to healthy food.
Plains Region Of U.S.
20,505,437
Total Population
13,743,862
Urban Population
6,761,575
Rural Population
29.47%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
28.33%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
30.61%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
5,702,478
Population With Poor Acccess
4,429,833
Urban Population With Poor Acccess
1,272,644
Rural Population With Poor Acccess
1.51%
Population With No Vehicular Acccess
1.93%
Urban Population With No Vehicular Acccess
1.09%
Rural Population With No Vehicular Acccess
Kids (Age 0-17)
4,953,044
Estimated Total Number of Kids In Region (2010)
3,955,260
Estimated Total Number of Kids In Urban Residences In Region (2010)
997,784
Estimated Total Number of Kids In Rural Residences In Region (2010)
29.18%
Rate of Kids With Low Access
28.85%
Rate of Urban Kids With Low Access
30.49%
Rate of Rural Kids With Low Access
1,445,185
Population With Poor Acccess
1,141,003
Urban Population With Poor Acccess
304,182
Rural Population With Poor Acccess
Seniors (Age 65+)
2,602,793
Estimated Total Number of Seniors In America (2010)
1,849,035
Estimated Total Number of Seniors In Urban Residences In America (2010)
753,757
Estimated Total Number of Seniors In Rural Residences In America (2010)
29.06%
Rate of Seniors With Low Access
28.03%
Rate of Urban Seniors With Low Access
31.58%
Rate of Rural Seniors With Low Access
756,310
Population With Poor Acccess
518,276
Urban Population With Poor Acccess
238,034
Rural Population With Poor Acccess
Worst 20 Neighborhoods For Healthy Food Access
20 Nelson, North Dakota
3,126
Total Population
0
Urban Population
3,126
Rural Population
100%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
100%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
19 Jones, South Dakota
1,006
Total Population
0
Urban Population
1,006
Rural Population
100%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
100%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
18 Logan, Nebraska
763
Total Population
0
Urban Population
763
Rural Population
100%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
100%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
17 Webster, Nebraska
3,812
Total Population
0
Urban Population
3,812
Rural Population
100%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
100%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
16 Wichita, Kansas
2,234
Total Population
0
Urban Population
2,234
Rural Population
100%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
100%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
15 Greeley, Kansas
1,247
Total Population
0
Urban Population
1,247
Rural Population
100%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
100%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
14 Haskell, Kansas
4,256
Total Population
0
Urban Population
4,256
Rural Population
100%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
100%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
13 Hamilton, Kansas
2,690
Total Population
0
Urban Population
2,690
Rural Population
100%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
100%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
12 Jerauld, South Dakota
2,071
Total Population
0
Urban Population
2,071
Rural Population
100%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
100%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
11 Sully, South Dakota
1,373
Total Population
0
Urban Population
1,373
Rural Population
100%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
100%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
10 McHenry, North Dakota
5,395
Total Population
0
Urban Population
5,395
Rural Population
100%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
100%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
9 Boyd, Nebraska
2,099
Total Population
0
Urban Population
2,099
Rural Population
100%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
100%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
8 Potter, South Dakota
2,329
Total Population
0
Urban Population
2,329
Rural Population
100%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
100%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
7 Lane, Kansas
1,750
Total Population
0
Urban Population
1,750
Rural Population
100%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
100%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
6 Thomas, Nebraska
647
Total Population
0
Urban Population
647
Rural Population
100%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
100%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
5 Frontier, Nebraska
2,756
Total Population
0
Urban Population
2,756
Rural Population
100%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
100%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
4 Hayes, Nebraska
967
Total Population
0
Urban Population
967
Rural Population
100%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
100%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
3 Banner, Nebraska
690
Total Population
0
Urban Population
690
Rural Population
100%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
100%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
2 McPherson, Nebraska
539
Total Population
0
Urban Population
539
Rural Population
100%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
100%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
1 Arthur, Nebraska
460
Total Population
0
Urban Population
460
Rural Population
100%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
100%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
Source: Economic Research Service (ERS) of the United States Department of Agriculture Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET