As part of our series on Access to Healthy Food in the United States, we are look at the 20 toughest neighborhoods in the Mid East region of the United States for gaining access to healthy food.
Mid East Region Of U.S.
48,145,584
Total Population
40,489,592
Urban Population
7,655,992
Rural Population
11.73%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
21.98%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
1.48%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
9,249,047
Population With Poor Acccess
9,126,141
Urban Population With Poor Acccess
139,940
Rural Population With Poor Acccess
.84%
Population With No Vehicular Acccess
1.6%
Urban Population With No Vehicular Acccess
.07%
Rural Population With No Vehicular Acccess
Kids (Age 0-17)
11,862,135
Estimated Total Number of Kids In Region (2010)
9,606,257
Estimated Total Number of Kids In Urban Residences In Region (2010)
2,255,878
Estimated Total Number of Kids In Rural Residences In Region (2010)
18.09%
Rate of Kids With Low Access
22.03%
Rate of Urban Kids With Low Access
1.32%
Rate of Rural Kids With Low Access
2,145,735
Population With Poor Acccess
2,115,994
Urban Population With Poor Acccess
29,740
Rural Population With Poor Acccess
Seniors (Age 65+)
7,508,073
Estimated Total Number of Seniors In America (2010)
6,036,026
Estimated Total Number of Seniors In Urban Residences In America (2010)
1,472,047
Estimated Total Number of Seniors In Rural Residences In America (2010)
18%
Rate of Seniors With Low Access
22.03%
Rate of Urban Seniors With Low Access
1.49%
Rate of Rural Seniors With Low Access
1,351,440
Population With Poor Acccess
1,329,478
Urban Population With Poor Acccess
21,962
Rural Population With Poor Acccess
Worst 20 Neighborhoods For Healthy Food Access
20 Wyoming, New York
42,155
Total Population
12,766
Urban Population
29,389
Rural Population
29.54%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
50.19%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
8.89%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
19 Hunterdon, New Jersey
128,349
Total Population
46,938
Urban Population
81,411
Rural Population
29.77%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
59.54%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
18 Cecil, Maryland
101,108
Total Population
41,908
Urban Population
59,200
Rural Population
29.96%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
59.62%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
.29%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
17 Beaver, Pennsylvania
170,539
Total Population
118,999
Urban Population
51,540
Rural Population
29.97%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
59.94%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
16 Bedford, Pennsylvania
49,762
Total Population
13,280
Urban Population
36,482
Rural Population
30.04%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
46.93%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
13.15%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
15 Monroe, Pennsylvania
169,842
Total Population
66,311
Urban Population
103,531
Rural Population
30.13%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
60.26%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
14 Somerset, Maryland
26,470
Total Population
6,487
Urban Population
19,983
Rural Population
30.16%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
50.44%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
9.88%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
13 Warren, New Jersey
108,692
Total Population
58,512
Urban Population
50,180
Rural Population
30.2%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
60.41%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
12 Hamilton, New York
4,836
Total Population
0
Urban Population
4,836
Rural Population
30.29%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
30.29%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
11 Union, Pennsylvania
44,947
Total Population
16,191
Urban Population
28,756
Rural Population
32.04%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
62.56%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
1.51%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
10 Sussex, Delaware
197,145
Total Population
100,833
Urban Population
96,312
Rural Population
32.09%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
64.18%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
9 Sussex, New Jersey
149,265
Total Population
82,606
Urban Population
66,659
Rural Population
34.18%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
68.35%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
8 Otsego, New York
62,259
Total Population
19,130
Urban Population
43,129
Rural Population
34.78%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
57.81%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
11.75%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
7 Rockland, New York
311,687
Total Population
311,687
Urban Population
0
Rural Population
35.2%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
35.2%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
6 Garrett, Maryland
30,097
Total Population
6,186
Urban Population
23,911
Rural Population
36.38%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
72.19%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
.56%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
5 Calvert, Maryland
88,737
Total Population
45,501
Urban Population
43,236
Rural Population
37.41%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
74.82%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
4 Sullivan, Pennsylvania
6,428
Total Population
0
Urban Population
6,428
Rural Population
38.32%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
38.32%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
3 Schoharie, New York
32,749
Total Population
6,625
Urban Population
26,124
Rural Population
38.8%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
71.68%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
5.92%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
2 Montgomery, New York
50,219
Total Population
24,186
Urban Population
26,033
Rural Population
44.3%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
84.96%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
3.65%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
1 Queen Anne's, Maryland
47,798
Total Population
12,708
Urban Population
35,090
Rural Population
45.07%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
89.88%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
.25%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
Source: Economic Research Service (ERS) of the United States Department of Agriculture Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET