As part of our series on Access to Healthy Food in the United States, we take a look at how neighborhoods in the State of Texas rank for gaining access to healthy food.
State of Texas
25,145,561
Total Population
20,039,481
Urban Population
5,106,080
Rural Population
23.67%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
32.28%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
15.06%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
7,639,097
Population With Poor Acccess
7,107,047
Urban Population With Poor Acccess
532,049
Rural Population With Poor Acccess
1.34%
Population With No Vehicular Acccess
2.05%
Urban Population With No Vehicular Acccess
.63%
Rural Population With No Vehicular Acccess
Kids (Age 0-17)
7,191,721
Estimated Total Number of Kids In Texas (2010)
6,359,625
Estimated Total Number of Kids In Urban Residences In Texas (2010)
832,096
Estimated Total Number of Kids In Rural Residences In Texas (2010)
30.27%
Rate of Kids With Low Access
32.29%
Rate of Urban Kids With Low Access
14.8%
Rate of Rural Kids With Low Access
2,176,874
Population With Poor Acccess
2,053,746
Urban Population With Poor Acccess
123,129
Rural Population With Poor Acccess
Seniors (Age 65+)
2,584,566
Estimated Total Number of Seniors In Texas (2010)
2,003,238
Estimated Total Number of Seniors In Urban Residences In Texas (2010)
581,327
Estimated Total Number of Seniors In Rural Residences In Texas (2010)
28.17%
Rate of Seniors With Low Access
31.81%
Rate of Urban Seniors With Low Access
15.62%
Rate of Rural Seniors With Low Access
728,082
Population With Poor Acccess
637,261
Urban Population With Poor Acccess
90,821
Rural Population With Poor Acccess
Worst 20 Texas Neighborhoods For Healthy Food Access
20 Roberts, Texas
929
Total Population
0
Urban Population
929
Rural Population
90.76%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
90.76%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
19 Kent, Texas
808
Total Population
0
Urban Population
808
Rural Population
97.2%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
97.2%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
18 Kenedy, Texas
416
Total Population
0
Urban Population
416
Rural Population
97.38%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
97.38%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
17 McMullen, Texas
707
Total Population
0
Urban Population
707
Rural Population
98%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
98%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
16 Glasscock, Texas
1,226
Total Population
0
Urban Population
1,226
Rural Population
98.24%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
98.24%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
15 Armstrong, Texas
1,901
Total Population
0
Urban Population
1,901
Rural Population
99.75%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
99.75%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
14 Hudspeth, Texas
3,476
Total Population
0
Urban Population
3,476
Rural Population
99.92%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
99.92%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
13 Irion, Texas
1,599
Total Population
0
Urban Population
1,599
Rural Population
99.97%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
99.97%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
12 Coke, Texas
3,320
Total Population
0
Urban Population
3,320
Rural Population
99.98%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
99.98%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
11 Lipscomb, Texas
3,302
Total Population
0
Urban Population
3,302
Rural Population
100%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
100%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
10 Loving, Texas
82
Total Population
0
Urban Population
82
Rural Population
100%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
100%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
9 King, Texas
286
Total Population
0
Urban Population
286
Rural Population
100%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
100%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
8 Real, Texas
3,309
Total Population
0
Urban Population
3,309
Rural Population
100%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
100%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
7 Terrell, Texas
984
Total Population
0
Urban Population
984
Rural Population
100%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
100%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
6 Borden, Texas
641
Total Population
0
Urban Population
641
Rural Population
100%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
100%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
5 Briscoe, Texas
1,637
Total Population
0
Urban Population
1,637
Rural Population
100%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
100%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
4 Throckmorton, Texas
1,641
Total Population
0
Urban Population
1,641
Rural Population
100%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
100%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
3 Oldham, Texas
2,052
Total Population
0
Urban Population
2,052
Rural Population
100%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
100%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
2 Sterling, Texas
1,143
Total Population
0
Urban Population
1,143
Rural Population
100%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
100%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
1 Foard, Texas
1,336
Total Population
0
Urban Population
1,336
Rural Population
100%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
100%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
Source: Economic Research Service (ERS) of the United States Department of Agriculture Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET