As part of our series on Access to Healthy Food in the United States, we take a look at how neighborhoods in the State of North Carolina rank for gaining access to healthy food.
State of North Carolina
9,535,483
Total Population
5,802,220
Urban Population
3,733,263
Rural Population
19.93%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
37.57%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
2.28%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
2,368,417
Population With Poor Acccess
2,295,009
Urban Population With Poor Acccess
73,408
Rural Population With Poor Acccess
1.52%
Population With No Vehicular Acccess
2.91%
Urban Population With No Vehicular Acccess
.13%
Rural Population With No Vehicular Acccess
Kids (Age 0-17)
2,235,721
Estimated Total Number of Kids In North Carolina (2010)
1,545,973
Estimated Total Number of Kids In Urban Residences In North Carolina (2010)
689,747
Estimated Total Number of Kids In Rural Residences In North Carolina (2010)
26.71%
Rate of Kids With Low Access
37.63%
Rate of Urban Kids With Low Access
2.24%
Rate of Rural Kids With Low Access
597,251
Population With Poor Acccess
581,798
Urban Population With Poor Acccess
15,453
Rural Population With Poor Acccess
Seniors (Age 65+)
1,263,826
Estimated Total Number of Seniors In North Carolina (2010)
739,776
Estimated Total Number of Seniors In Urban Residences In North Carolina (2010)
524,051
Estimated Total Number of Seniors In Rural Residences In North Carolina (2010)
22.57%
Rate of Seniors With Low Access
36.9%
Rate of Urban Seniors With Low Access
2.34%
Rate of Rural Seniors With Low Access
285,236
Population With Poor Acccess
272,968
Urban Population With Poor Acccess
12,268
Rural Population With Poor Acccess
Worst 20 North Carolina Neighborhoods For Healthy Food Access
20 Harnett, North Carolina
114,678
Total Population
40,036
Urban Population
74,642
Rural Population
28.91%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
57.82%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
19 Hyde, North Carolina
5,810
Total Population
0
Urban Population
5,810
Rural Population
29.6%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
29.6%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
18 Bladen, North Carolina
35,190
Total Population
6,252
Urban Population
28,938
Rural Population
29.67%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
52.48%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
6.86%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
17 Lee, North Carolina
57,866
Total Population
29,228
Urban Population
28,638
Rural Population
29.77%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
59.53%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
16 Caldwell, North Carolina
83,029
Total Population
44,518
Urban Population
38,511
Rural Population
29.86%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
58.66%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
1.06%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
15 Alexander, North Carolina
37,198
Total Population
13,197
Urban Population
24,001
Rural Population
30.83%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
61.3%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
.35%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
14 Dare, North Carolina
33,920
Total Population
23,373
Urban Population
10,547
Rural Population
31.43%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
54.85%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
8.02%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
13 Montgomery, North Carolina
27,798
Total Population
6,431
Urban Population
21,367
Rural Population
31.7%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
62.92%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
.47%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
12 Jackson, North Carolina
40,271
Total Population
4,224
Urban Population
36,047
Rural Population
32.5%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
62.71%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
2.29%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
11 Yadkin, North Carolina
38,406
Total Population
7,130
Urban Population
31,276
Rural Population
32.81%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
65.54%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
.08%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
10 Lincoln, North Carolina
78,265
Total Population
32,292
Urban Population
45,973
Rural Population
33.02%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
66.04%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
9 Stokes, North Carolina
47,401
Total Population
6,884
Urban Population
40,517
Rural Population
33.03%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
58.3%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
7.76%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
8 Granville, North Carolina
59,916
Total Population
15,310
Urban Population
44,606
Rural Population
33.35%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
63.52%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
3.18%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
7 Brunswick, North Carolina
107,431
Total Population
46,909
Urban Population
60,522
Rural Population
33.81%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
66.04%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
1.58%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
6 Moore, North Carolina
88,247
Total Population
40,080
Urban Population
48,167
Rural Population
34.21%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
68.14%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
.28%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
5 Ashe, North Carolina
27,281
Total Population
6,528
Urban Population
20,753
Rural Population
34.41%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
60.36%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
8.47%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
4 Davie, North Carolina
41,240
Total Population
16,744
Urban Population
24,496
Rural Population
36.42%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
72.84%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
3 Columbus, North Carolina
58,098
Total Population
5,687
Urban Population
52,411
Rural Population
40.01%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
79.35%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
.66%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
2 Pender, North Carolina
52,217
Total Population
11,842
Urban Population
40,375
Rural Population
49.77%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
92.19%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
7.35%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
1 Bertie, North Carolina
21,282
Total Population
7,985
Urban Population
13,297
Rural Population
51.15%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
91.83%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
10.46%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
Source: Economic Research Service (ERS) of the United States Department of Agriculture Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET