As part of our series on Access to Healthy Food in the United States, we take a look at how neighborhoods in the State of Alabama rank for gaining access to healthy food.
State of Alabama
4,779,736
Total Population
2,569,178
Urban Population
2,210,558
Rural Population
24.25%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
39.9%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
8.6%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
1,232,503
Population With Poor Acccess
1,113,574
Urban Population With Poor Acccess
118,929
Rural Population With Poor Acccess
2.12%
Population With No Vehicular Acccess
3.55%
Urban Population With No Vehicular Acccess
.69%
Rural Population With No Vehicular Acccess
Kids (Age 0-17)
988,115
Estimated Total Number of Kids In Region (2010)
679,250
Estimated Total Number of Kids In Urban Residences In Region (2010)
308,865
Estimated Total Number of Kids In Rural Residences In Region (2010)
30%
Rate of Kids With Low Access
39.79%
Rate of Urban Kids With Low Access
8.47%
Rate of Rural Kids With Low Access
296,463
Population With Poor Acccess
270,298
Urban Population With Poor Acccess
26,165
Rural Population With Poor Acccess
Seniors (Age 65+)
579,382
Estimated Total Number of Seniors In America (2010)
360,660
Estimated Total Number of Seniors In Urban Residences In America (2010)
218,722
Estimated Total Number of Seniors In Rural Residences In America (2010)
27.76%
Rate of Seniors With Low Access
39.22%
Rate of Urban Seniors With Low Access
8.84%
Rate of Rural Seniors With Low Access
160,812
Population With Poor Acccess
141,467
Urban Population With Poor Acccess
19,345
Rural Population With Poor Acccess
Worst 20 Neighborhoods For Healthy Food Access
20 Lee, Alabama
140,247
Total Population
108,214
Urban Population
32,033
Rural Population
30.21%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
58.63%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
1.78%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
19 Elmore, Alabama
79,303
Total Population
16,971
Urban Population
62,332
Rural Population
31.34%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
62.11%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
.58%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
18 Randolph, Alabama
22,913
Total Population
5,078
Urban Population
17,835
Rural Population
31.61%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
59.09%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
4.13%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
17 Coffee, Alabama
49,948
Total Population
26,278
Urban Population
23,670
Rural Population
31.8%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
49.92%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
13.68%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
16 Chilton, Alabama
43,643
Total Population
6,303
Urban Population
37,340
Rural Population
32.56%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
63.03%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
2.09%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
15 Walker, Alabama
67,023
Total Population
9,355
Urban Population
57,668
Rural Population
32.96%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
65.42%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
.5%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
14 Baldwin, Alabama
182,265
Total Population
82,744
Urban Population
99,521
Rural Population
33.31%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
58.42%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
8.21%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
13 Dale, Alabama
50,251
Total Population
17,207
Urban Population
33,044
Rural Population
34.26%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
61.1%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
7.43%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
12 Macon, Alabama
21,452
Total Population
10,340
Urban Population
11,112
Rural Population
36.93%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
55.75%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
18.12%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
11 St. Clair, Alabama
83,593
Total Population
10,508
Urban Population
73,085
Rural Population
38.11%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
76.21%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
10 Marengo, Alabama
21,027
Total Population
5,235
Urban Population
15,792
Rural Population
38.15%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
29.64%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
46.66%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
9 Clarke, Alabama
25,833
Total Population
9,745
Urban Population
16,088
Rural Population
39.86%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
62.94%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
16.79%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
8 Cherokee, Alabama
25,989
Total Population
4,017
Urban Population
21,972
Rural Population
40.7%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
81.08%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
.32%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
7 Autauga, Alabama
54,571
Total Population
29,166
Urban Population
25,405
Rural Population
42.6%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
45.93%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
39.28%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
6 Lowndes, Alabama
11,299
Total Population
0
Urban Population
11,299
Rural Population
43.75%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
43.75%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
5 Monroe, Alabama
23,068
Total Population
0
Urban Population
23,068
Rural Population
44.82%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
44.82%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
4 Greene, Alabama
9,045
Total Population
0
Urban Population
9,045
Rural Population
46.67%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
46.67%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
3 Crenshaw, Alabama
13,906
Total Population
0
Urban Population
13,906
Rural Population
47.98%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
47.98%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
2 Wilcox, Alabama
11,670
Total Population
0
Urban Population
11,670
Rural Population
55.44%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
55.44%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
1 Bullock, Alabama
10,914
Total Population
7,102
Urban Population
3,812
Rural Population
59.25%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
49.99%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
68.51%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET