As part of our series on Access to Healthy Food in the United States, we take a look at how neighborhoods in the State of Massachusetts rank for gaining access to healthy food.
State of Massachusetts
6,547,629
Total Population
5,900,493
Urban Population
647,136
Rural Population
15.89%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
29.76%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
2.02%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
1,995,516
Population With Poor Acccess
1,985,794
Urban Population With Poor Acccess
9,722
Rural Population With Poor Acccess
.78%
Population With No Vehicular Acccess
1.51%
Urban Population With No Vehicular Acccess
.05%
Rural Population With No Vehicular Acccess
Kids (Age 0-17)
1,640,495
Estimated Total Number of Kids In Massachusetts (2010)
1,549,644
Estimated Total Number of Kids In Urban Residences In Massachusetts (2010)
90,851
Estimated Total Number of Kids In Rural Residences In Massachusetts (2010)
28.35%
Rate of Kids With Low Access
29.9%
Rate of Urban Kids With Low Access
1.94%
Rate of Rural Kids With Low Access
465,032
Population With Poor Acccess
463,269
Urban Population With Poor Acccess
1,763
Rural Population With Poor Acccess
Seniors (Age 65+)
1,046,499
Estimated Total Number of Seniors In Massachusetts (2010)
974,677
Estimated Total Number of Seniors In Urban Residences In Massachusetts (2010)
71,823
Estimated Total Number of Seniors In Rural Residences In Massachusetts (2010)
27.53%
Rate of Seniors With Low Access
29.4%
Rate of Urban Seniors With Low Access
2.13%
Rate of Rural Seniors With Low Access
288,135
Population With Poor Acccess
286,603
Urban Population With Poor Acccess
1,533
Rural Population With Poor Acccess
Worst 20 Massachusetts Neighborhoods For Healthy Food Access
14 Suffolk, Massachusetts
722,023
Total Population
721,488
Urban Population
535
Rural Population
1.73%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
3.46%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
13 Nantucket, Massachusetts
10,172
Total Population
8,666
Urban Population
1,506
Rural Population
12.04%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
24.07%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
12 Middlesex, Massachusetts
1,503,085
Total Population
1,423,953
Urban Population
79,132
Rural Population
12.81%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
25.62%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
11 Bristol, Massachusetts
548,285
Total Population
457,972
Urban Population
90,313
Rural Population
14.05%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
28.1%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
10 Hampden, Massachusetts
463,490
Total Population
420,827
Urban Population
42,663
Rural Population
16.48%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
29.09%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
3.86%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
9 Essex, Massachusetts
743,159
Total Population
691,900
Urban Population
51,259
Rural Population
16.58%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
33.16%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
8 Norfolk, Massachusetts
670,850
Total Population
662,431
Urban Population
8,419
Rural Population
18.72%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
37.44%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
7 Worcester, Massachusetts
798,552
Total Population
646,611
Urban Population
151,941
Rural Population
19.8%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
39.6%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
.01%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
6 Franklin, Massachusetts
71,372
Total Population
31,113
Urban Population
40,259
Rural Population
20.26%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
40%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
.51%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
5 Berkshire, Massachusetts
131,219
Total Population
92,710
Urban Population
38,509
Rural Population
22.09%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
37.9%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
6.29%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
4 Plymouth, Massachusetts
494,919
Total Population
420,788
Urban Population
74,131
Rural Population
26.03%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
52.06%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
3 Dukes, Massachusetts
16,535
Total Population
12,543
Urban Population
3,992
Rural Population
28.03%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
54.46%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
1.6%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
2 Barnstable, Massachusetts
215,888
Total Population
188,194
Urban Population
27,694
Rural Population
28.8%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
57.59%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
1 Hampshire, Massachusetts
158,080
Total Population
121,297
Urban Population
36,783
Rural Population
30.28%
Rate of Total Population With Low Access
43.75%
Rate of Total Urban Population With Low Access
16.81%
Rate of Rural Population With Low Access
Source: Economic Research Service (ERS) of the United States Department of Agriculture Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET
Source: O*NET